2026.03.29 20:00 Gitea_manager javítás előtt
This commit is contained in:
Roo
136
docs/verified_service_reviews_implementation.md
Normal file
136
docs/verified_service_reviews_implementation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
||||
# Verified Service Reviews Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
This document describes the implementation of verified service reviews (Social 3 module) as specified in `logic_spec_66_verified_service_reviews.md`. The implementation adds transaction-based verification to service reviews, ensuring that only users who have completed a financial transaction with a service provider can leave verified reviews.
|
||||
|
||||
## Changes Made
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Model Updates
|
||||
|
||||
#### `backend/app/models/identity/social.py` - ServiceReview Model
|
||||
- Added foreign key constraint from `transaction_id` to `audit.financial_ledger.transaction_id`
|
||||
- Added `ForeignKey("audit.financial_ledger.transaction_id", ondelete="RESTRICT")` to the `transaction_id` field
|
||||
- Added relationship `financial_transaction` to FinancialLedger model
|
||||
- The foreign key ensures that service reviews can only reference valid financial transactions
|
||||
|
||||
#### `backend/app/models/system/audit.py` - FinancialLedger Model
|
||||
- Added `unique=True` constraint to `transaction_id` field
|
||||
- This ensures `transaction_id` has a unique constraint required for foreign key reference
|
||||
- Changed from `index=True` to `unique=True, index=True`
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Database Schema Impact
|
||||
- **Foreign Key**: `identity.service_reviews.transaction_id` → `audit.financial_ledger.transaction_id`
|
||||
- **Unique Constraint**: Added unique constraint on `audit.financial_ledger.transaction_id`
|
||||
- **Relationship**: ServiceReview now has a `financial_transaction` relationship to FinancialLedger
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Business Logic Implementation
|
||||
The implementation follows the logic spec requirements:
|
||||
- Service reviews are linked to financial transactions via `transaction_id`
|
||||
- Only users who have completed transactions can leave verified reviews
|
||||
- The foreign key uses `ondelete="RESTRICT"` to prevent deletion of financial ledger entries that have associated reviews
|
||||
- The relationship allows easy access to transaction details from service reviews
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Migration Status
|
||||
- Model changes have been implemented in Python code
|
||||
- Database schema changes require manual migration due to project constraints on Alembic usage
|
||||
- The `sync_engine.py` script confirms the models are properly defined but database synchronization needs to be performed
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Details
|
||||
|
||||
### Foreign Key Constraint
|
||||
```python
|
||||
transaction_id: Mapped[uuid.UUID] = mapped_column(
|
||||
PG_UUID(as_uuid=True),
|
||||
ForeignKey("audit.financial_ledger.transaction_id", ondelete="RESTRICT"),
|
||||
nullable=False,
|
||||
index=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Unique Constraint on FinancialLedger
|
||||
```python
|
||||
transaction_id: Mapped[uuid.UUID] = mapped_column(
|
||||
PG_UUID(as_uuid=True), default=uuid.uuid4, nullable=False, unique=True, index=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Relationship
|
||||
```python
|
||||
financial_transaction: Mapped["FinancialLedger"] = relationship(
|
||||
"FinancialLedger",
|
||||
foreign_keys=[transaction_id]
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps Required
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Database Migration
|
||||
The following SQL commands need to be executed to apply the schema changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
-- 1. Add unique constraint to audit.financial_ledger.transaction_id
|
||||
ALTER TABLE audit.financial_ledger
|
||||
ADD CONSTRAINT uq_financial_ledger_transaction_id
|
||||
UNIQUE (transaction_id);
|
||||
|
||||
-- 2. Add foreign key constraint to identity.service_reviews.transaction_id
|
||||
ALTER TABLE identity.service_reviews
|
||||
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_service_reviews_transaction_id
|
||||
FOREIGN KEY (transaction_id)
|
||||
REFERENCES audit.financial_ledger(transaction_id)
|
||||
ON DELETE RESTRICT;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. API Endpoints
|
||||
According to the logic spec, the following API endpoints need to be implemented:
|
||||
- `POST /marketplace/service-reviews` - Create a new service review
|
||||
- `GET /marketplace/service-reviews/{service_id}` - Get reviews for a service
|
||||
- `GET /marketplace/service-reviews/user/{user_id}` - Get user's reviews
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Service Layer
|
||||
The service layer (`marketplace_service.py`) needs to be updated to:
|
||||
- Validate that users have completed transactions before allowing verified reviews
|
||||
- Calculate aggregated ratings for service profiles
|
||||
- Implement the trust score influence factor logic
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Scenarios
|
||||
1. **Valid Review**: User with completed transaction can leave verified review
|
||||
2. **Invalid Review**: User without transaction cannot leave verified review
|
||||
3. **Transaction Deletion Attempt**: Attempt to delete financial ledger entry with associated reviews should be restricted
|
||||
4. **Aggregated Ratings**: Service profile ratings should update when new verified reviews are added
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Validation
|
||||
- `transaction_id` must reference an existing `audit.financial_ledger` entry
|
||||
- Review window validation (based on `REVIEW_WINDOW_DAYS` system parameter)
|
||||
- Trust score influence factor application
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Dependencies
|
||||
- **Financial Ledger**: Requires `audit.financial_ledger` table with unique `transaction_id`
|
||||
- **Service Profiles**: Requires `marketplace.service_profiles` table for aggregated ratings
|
||||
- **System Parameters**: Requires `REVIEW_WINDOW_DAYS` and `TRUST_SCORE_INFLUENCE_FACTOR` parameters
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Dependencies
|
||||
- **Service Finder Algorithm**: Verified reviews influence service ranking
|
||||
- **User Trust System**: Review verification contributes to user trust scores
|
||||
- **Analytics**: Aggregated ratings used in business intelligence reports
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Changes
|
||||
- Added `ondelete="RESTRICT"` to prevent accidental data loss
|
||||
- Unique constraint on `transaction_id` ensures data integrity
|
||||
- Foreign key maintains referential integrity between reviews and transactions
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Considerations
|
||||
- Index on `transaction_id` in both tables ensures efficient joins
|
||||
- Aggregated ratings in `service_profiles` table prevent expensive calculations at query time
|
||||
- Proper indexing strategy for review queries by service and user
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
The verified service reviews implementation provides a robust foundation for transaction-based review verification. The model changes ensure data integrity and proper relationships between financial transactions and service reviews. The implementation follows the Masterbook 2.0 architecture and prepares the system for the complete Social 3 module implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: Model implementation complete, database migration pending, API endpoints to be implemented.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user